Quick answer
TOEFL Writing in 2026 is 23 minutes and 12 items worth 20 raw points. You get 10 Build a Sentence items worth 1 point each, one Write an Email task worth 5 points in about seven minutes, and one Write for an Academic Discussion task worth 5 points in about ten minutes.
The section in one paragraph
TOEFL Writing is 23 minutes long and contains 12 items. Those 12 items are not 12 essays. Ten of them are single-sentence puzzles called Build a Sentence, worth one point each. The other two are the pieces of continuous writing most people picture when they think of TOEFL: one email, and one post in an online class discussion. Each of those two is scored out of 5. Add it up and the section is worth 20 raw points.
That arithmetic is the first thing worth internalising, because it is not what most test-takers assume. Half of the raw points in Writing come from the ten short items. The band works differently: your Build a Sentence total is converted to a score out of 5 and then averaged with the email and the discussion, so it carries a third of your Writing band rather than half. Either way it is far more than most students give it. Students routinely spend weeks polishing essay templates and almost no time on word order, then lose four or five Build a Sentence points on test day and cannot work out why their band did not move.
The section is linear. You work through Build a Sentence first, then the email, then the discussion, and you cannot go back. Each task has its own clock. When the email timer runs out, the email is submitted as it stands and the discussion screen opens. There is no shared pool of time you can borrow from, and there is no review screen at the end.
The three tasks at a glance
| Task | Items | Raw points | Time | What you produce |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Build a Sentence | 10 | 10 (1 each) | About six and a half minutes for all ten | One correctly ordered sentence per item |
| Write an Email | 1 | 5 | About 7 minutes | A complete email, roughly 100 to 150 words |
| Write for an Academic Discussion | 1 | 5 | About 10 minutes | A discussion post of at least 100 words |
Timings are per task. The section total is 23 minutes and you cannot move time between tasks.
What Build a Sentence actually looks like
A Build a Sentence item puts two people on screen. One of them says something, and you complete the reply. The reply is shown as a fixed beginning, a row of empty blanks, and a full stop or question mark at the end. Underneath sit word chunks in scrambled order, and you drag them into the blanks.
Here is a real example of the shape. Amelia says, Where did you get this recipe? Daniel's reply begins with I and ends with a full stop, and there are six blanks. The chunks offered are: I watched, got, cooked, it, cooking show, from a, that. Six blanks, seven chunks. One chunk is a decoy that does not belong in any correct answer. The sentence is I got it from a cooking show that I watched. and cooked is the decoy.
Two features of that item are worth naming now because they repeat across all ten. First, the number of chunks is almost always one more than the number of blanks, so there is a distractor to eliminate. The distractor is usually a wrong form of a verb that is already in the set, or a near-synonym that does not fit the grammar. Second, the item is testing one specific structure. That one was testing a relative clause attaching to the noun it describes. Ten items means ten structures, and they are drawn from a small, learnable set.
You are not being asked to write a beautiful sentence. You are being asked to recognise which arrangement of the given pieces is English. That is a much narrower skill, and it responds very fast to practice.
Try it now: three real Build a Sentence items
Reading about this task is not the same as doing it. Tap the chunks in order to build the reply, then check. The first item is the Amelia and Daniel one described above, so you already know the answer; do it anyway, because what matters is noticing how fast the decoy stops looking plausible once you have a rule for spotting it. The next two are new.
Two roommates are talking in the kitchen.
Amelia“Where did you get this recipe?”
Daniel, make an appropriate sentence.
Two students are walking out of a lecture.
Marco“That was a lot to take in.”
Priya, make an appropriate sentence.
A student is at the library front desk.
Desk assistant“This book was due back on Friday.”
Student, make an appropriate sentence.
What the email task looks like
You get a situation, a recipient, a subject line that is already filled in, and a list of things your email has to do. The list is short and explicit. A real one reads: explain why you are writing and how important the essay is, describe the problem you have had while trying to upload the file, and ask about another way you can submit the essay in time.
Those three lines are the scoring key. The band descriptors for this task are written around them. A response that covers all three points with an appropriate greeting, a consistently polite tone, accurate grammar and precise vocabulary is a 5. A response that covers all three adequately with minor errors is a 4. A response that leaves one point vague is a 3. A response that omits a point, or has no greeting or closing, is a 2.
Notice what that means. You do not climb from a 3 to a 4 by writing more elegantly. You climb by covering the point you left vague. Task completion is the top-weighted criterion and it is the one students most often lose on, because seven minutes is short and the third required point tends to be the one that gets rushed or forgotten.
The target length is around 100 to 150 words. That is deliberately modest. It is enough for a greeting, three short paragraphs and a sign-off, which is exactly the shape the task wants.
What the academic discussion task looks like
A professor posts a question in an online class forum. Two classmates have already replied, and you can read both. Your job is to add your own post of at least 100 words, taking a position and supporting it.
A real one: Professor Alvarez asks whether cities should adopt a sin tax on unhealthy foods. Mikhail has argued against, pointing to food deserts where residents depend on fast food because there is no supermarket in reach. Kaitlyn has argued for, pointing to sugar and saturated fat and to the school lunch programmes the revenue could fund.
The two classmate posts are not decoration. The band 5 descriptor asks for a contribution that engages meaningfully with the discussion, which is different from a contribution that simply states an opinion. A post that could have been written without reading Mikhail and Kaitlyn is capped in practice, because it is not a contribution to a discussion, it is an isolated opinion that happens to sit underneath one.
Ten minutes is the most generous window in the section, and it is the only place where you have room to develop an example properly. Use it there.
The 23 minutes, in order
- 1
Build a Sentence, items 1 to 10
About six and a half minutes for all ten, so roughly forty seconds each. Most items you will solve in fifteen seconds. That leaves slack for the two or three that are genuinely tricky. Read the speaker line first, because it fixes the tense and the topic of the reply, then find the verb chunk and the subject chunk before you touch anything else.
- 2
Write an Email, about 7 minutes
One minute to read the situation and the three required points. Four to five minutes to write. One minute to reread for the things that cost easy marks: a missing greeting, a missing sign-off, a required point you only gestured at.
- 3
Write for an Academic Discussion, about 10 minutes
Two minutes to read the professor's question and both classmate posts and decide your position. Six to seven minutes to write. One minute to check that you named a classmate, gave one concrete example, and closed the post rather than stopping mid-thought.
- 4
Submit
There is no review screen and no going back to an earlier task. Whatever is on the screen when a task timer expires is what gets scored, including a half-finished final sentence. This is why the last minute of each writing task belongs to checking, not to adding one more idea.
How the raw points become a band
Your Build a Sentence total out of 10, your email score out of 5 and your discussion score out of 5 are combined into a single Writing band. Bands run from 1.0 to 6.0 in half-point steps and are aligned to CEFR levels, so a Writing band tells an admissions office roughly where you sit between A1 and C2 in written English.
Because the three components are averaged rather than added raw, a weak component drags harder than most people expect. A student who scores 10 out of 10 on Build a Sentence, 4 on the email and 1 on the discussion because they ran out of time and wrote three sentences does not get credit for the perfect ten. The average is what moves.
The practical lesson is the same one every time: finish everything, even roughly. An unfinished discussion post costs more band than a slightly clumsy finished one.
What should already be automatic before test day
- Recognising the eight or nine grammar patterns that Build a Sentence keeps reusing, so you are matching a pattern rather than solving a puzzle from scratch.
- A fixed email skeleton: greeting, why I am writing, the problem in detail, the request, sign-off with your name.
- A fixed discussion skeleton: position, one classmate named and answered, one developed reason with a concrete example, one closing sentence.
- Typing at a speed where 130 words in five minutes is comfortable rather than a sprint.
- The habit of spending the last sixty seconds of each writing task rereading rather than adding.
- Checking who the email is addressed to before you pick a tone. Most go to an institutional reader, where contractions and casual openers are wrong. A few go to a classmate or another peer, where a first-name greeting and contractions are the correct register and are not marked down.
Check your understanding
Four questions on the format. If you miss one, reread the section it came from before moving on.
How many raw points is the Writing section worth in total?
Ten Build a Sentence items at 1 point each, plus 5 points for the email and 5 for the discussion, gives 20 raw points.12 is the number of items, not the number of points. Two of those items are worth 5 points each, not 1.30 is a scaled score range, not the raw point total for Writing.120 is the old total-test scale and has nothing to do with the raw points in this section.A Build a Sentence item gives you seven word chunks and six blanks. What is the extra chunk usually doing?
Items are built with one more chunk than blanks, and the surplus chunk is a distractor. In the recipe example the chunks included both got and cooked, and cooked belonged nowhere in the answer.There are no bonus points. Each item is worth exactly one point and only the arrangement in the blanks is scored.The decoy usually contradicts the tense rather than signalling it. Reading it as a tense clue is how students end up building the wrong sentence.The interface does not need spare copies, and using the decoy at all will normally make the sentence ungrammatical.Your email covers two of the three required points beautifully and mentions the third only in a half sentence at the end. What band does the descriptor point to?
The band 3 descriptor is written for exactly this case: addresses most points but one may be vague or underdeveloped. Quality of language cannot lift you past a completion problem.Band 5 requires fully addressing all three prompt points. Elegant language on two of them does not substitute for the third.Band 4 requires all three points addressed adequately. A half sentence tacked on at the end is not adequate treatment of a required point.Band 1 is reserved for responses missing two or more required points, or where serious errors make parts of the message unintelligible. Neither applies here.Why does an unfinished discussion post cost more than most students expect?
Build a Sentence, the email and the discussion are combined into one averaged band. A strong Build a Sentence score cannot compensate for a component near the bottom of the scale.A 0 is for a blank, off-topic, copied or non-English response. A short but relevant post is not automatically 0, though it will score low.Each task has its own independent clock. Running short on the discussion does not touch the email, which was submitted earlier.The email and the discussion are each worth 5 raw points. Neither is worth double the other.Where to go next
If you know the format and want to know what a rater is actually looking at, the scoring lesson takes the band descriptors apart line by line and shows what separates a 3 from a 4 and a 4 from a 5. If you would rather start converting practice into points immediately, go straight to the Build a Sentence lesson, because that is where the fastest gains are.
One habit to carry into every lesson that follows: whenever you finish a piece of practice writing, check it against the required points before you check it for grammar. Completion is the criterion that decides your band first, and grammar decides it second.
Common questions
No. The 2026 Writing section has three task types only: Build a Sentence, Write an Email, and Write for an Academic Discussion. Nothing in Writing involves audio or a reading passage to summarise.
The section is 23 minutes for 12 items. The email window is about seven minutes and the discussion window about ten, which leaves roughly six and a half minutes for the ten Build a Sentence items. Each task has its own timer and unused time does not carry forward.
The email task asks for roughly 100 to 150 words. The discussion task asks for at least 100 words. Going far beyond those figures does not earn extra credit and usually costs you the checking time that protects against easy errors.
No. The section is linear. Once a task timer ends, that response is submitted as it stands and the next task opens. There is no review screen at the end of the section.
Yes. The ten items convert into a score out of 5 that is averaged with your email score and your discussion score, so they carry about a third of your Writing band. They are also the most improvable part of the section, because the same grammar patterns recur.
Bands run from 1.0 to 6.0 in half-point steps and are aligned to CEFR levels, so your Writing band maps roughly onto a level between A1 and C2.