Why does the speaker say that? Learn to hear hedging, reluctance and concession, and answer TOEFL attitude and function questions on four practice clips.
12 min readMonthly & Premium
Quick answer
Attitude and function questions ask why a speaker said something rather than what they said. The answer is almost always adjacent: the reason sits in the clause immediately before or after the detail. Learn the hedges, concessions and hesitations that mark attitude, and never infer feeling from tone alone.
Three question labels, one skill
Why does the man mention double-checking their flight times. What does the woman imply about the writing centre. What is the speaker's attitude towards the study. These look like three different question types and they are one skill in three costumes: recognising the job a piece of speech is doing in the conversation or talk around it.
Most test takers are good at content and poor at function, because content is what language courses teach. You learn what words mean. You are rarely taught that certainly thorough is a complaint, that a repeated number followed by a pause is a reservation, or that I am not saying the finding is wrong exists specifically to stop you drawing a conclusion the speaker does not want.
The reassuring part is that these questions are less about intuition than they look. In the shipped tests, the reason a speaker mentions something is almost always spoken aloud within one clause of the mention. The man says he will double-check the flight times, and the very next phrase is so we can make sure we get to the rental place on time. The lecturer gives a date and immediately says it is only two weeks after the session, so come with your questions ready.
That gives you a working rule that beats intuition: when a function question names a detail, look at what sits directly beside that detail. Not at your feeling about the speaker. At the adjacent clause.
What each attitude sounds like
Attitude
How it is signalled
What the right answer usually says
Enthusiasm
Intensifiers and immediate agreement. Absolutely. Definitely. That would be perfect. I have been wanting more of this.
The speaker is pleased and often gives a reason tied to their own situation.
Reservation
Repetition of the other speaker's word, a pause, a tag question. Nine. Right. That is early, is it not?
The speaker has doubts but is not refusing.
Polite criticism
Faint praise plus a specific number. Certainly thorough. Very ambitious. It is a lot to get through.
The speaker thinks it is excessive or impractical.
Concession
I am not saying. Of course. Granted. To be fair. That is true, but.
The speaker accepts part of an objection in order to protect the rest of their point.
Reassurance
Either way. Do not worry about. You will not need to. There is no charge.
The speaker is removing an obstacle the listener might assume exists.
Correction of an assumption
Actually. No, they do a lot more. It is not about blame. I thought so too, but.
The speaker is repairing something the other person believes.
Verbal markers, not tone. These are the things you can actually point at afterwards in a transcript.
Clip 1: praise that is not praise
What does the speaker suggest about the reading list?
The judgement is not in the adjective, it is in the number placed next to it. Forty-one books against ten weeks is the argument, and thorough is the polite frame around it. Whenever faint praise is immediately followed by a specific figure, the figure is the point.This is the literal reading of thorough with the second sentence ignored. If the speaker meant it as a compliment she would not need to count.Nothing about her own reading history is said. Counting the books is not the same as having read them.Organisation is never mentioned. The complaint is about quantity against available time.
Show transcript
Well, the reading list is certainly thorough. I counted forty-one books for a ten-week course.
How to answer a function question
1
Locate the detail the question names
Function questions almost always quote something specific: the flight times, the fifteenth of March, finishing in the dark. Find it in your notes or your memory of the clip before you read a single option.
2
Look at the clause immediately before and after
This is where the reason lives, and in the shipped tests it lives there with remarkable consistency. Speakers explain themselves in the same breath. If you cannot recall the adjacent clause, that is a note-taking gap, not a comprehension one.
3
Ask what would break if the detail were removed
If deleting it would leave the listener with a false belief, its function is correction or reassurance. If deleting it would leave a plan unworkable, its function is a constraint. If deleting it would make the speaker sound harsher, its function is a concession or a softener.
4
Choose the option that names a job, not a fact
Wrong options on function questions are frequently true statements. The correct option describes what the utterance was doing. Prefer the option that starts with a verb of purpose: to warn, to explain, to reassure, to correct, to make sure.
Clip 2: reluctance, then agreement
What is Speaker B's attitude when he says "Nine. Right."?
Three markers stack up in one turn: repeating the other speaker's number, a hesitation, and a tag question. None of them is a refusal, and together they are the standard shape of a doubt raised without a challenge.Enthusiastic confirmation does not hesitate and does not add is not it. Compare with his later actually, yes, which is what genuine agreement sounds like in this clip.A request for repetition would be a question about the word, not about the wisdom of the time. He repeats it accurately, which shows he heard it.The day is not in question anywhere. This option takes a detail from the first turn and invents confusion about it.
Why does Speaker A mention finishing in the dark?
The clause sits directly after we could make it ten, but. It exists to close down the alternative Speaker B was implicitly asking for, which is exactly the adjacency rule at work.No equipment is discussed. Options that propose a practical solution the speakers never mention are common on function questions.A closing time is a rule; finishing in the dark is a consequence. The clip gives no rule at all.Speaker A is defending the nine o'clock start, not sympathising with the objection to it. He concedes nothing here.
What does Speaker B accept?
His actually, yes marks the one point in the clip where he moves from reluctance to genuine agreement, and it is attached to the driving offer rather than the time. Notice how the strongest agreement in a conversation is often not attached to the main topic.Ten was raised and immediately withdrawn, and Speaker B himself says nine is fine.The destination is never in question. The trailhead is fixed from the first turn.The four-hour drive the night before is background to his objection, not something newly offered or accepted.
Show transcript
Speaker A: So we're all set for Saturday, then. Nine in the morning at the trailhead.
Speaker B: Nine. Right. That's, that's early, isn't it, for a four-hour drive the night before?
Speaker A: We could make it ten, but then we're finishing in the dark.
Speaker B: No, you're right, nine's fine. I'll just go to bed earlier.
Speaker A: We can swap driving if you want. You take the first hour and I'll do the rest.
Speaker B: Actually, yes. That would help a lot. Thanks.
Speaker A: Sorted. I'll pick you up at four.
Clip 3: an announcement that manages expectations
Why does the speaker say "I want to be honest with you"?
The phrase is a preface, and what follows it is a flat refusal: that is not going to happen. Speakers use honesty markers immediately before a piece of information the listener will not like, which is exactly what makes them a function question.No apology is offered and no error is admitted. The centre is describing its capacity, not conceding fault.Nothing suggests earlier announcements were wrong. The honesty marker is about the present message, not about past ones.Feedback is never requested. This option reads the word honest as an invitation rather than as a warning.
Why does the speaker mention that cancellations are free?
She has just told students to book in October for a December deadline. The obvious objection is that they might waste a slot, and the free cancellation line exists to answer that objection before anyone raises it. Removing an anticipated obstacle is one of the most common functions in campus announcements.No change of policy is announced. The clip states a current fact, not a new one.This is close to the opposite. Free and ten seconds are reassurances, not warnings about consequences.She recommends one appointment made early, not several. This option pushes a reasonable suggestion past what was said.
Show transcript
Good afternoon. A quick word about the writing centre. We've had a lot of students turn up in the last week of term expecting a same-day appointment, and I want to be honest with you: that isn't going to happen. In the final fortnight we book out four days ahead. So if your paper is due in December, make the appointment now, in October, and cancel it later if you don't need it. Cancellations are free and they take ten seconds. Thank you.
Attitude and function checklist
Find the named detail first, then read the clause on either side of it.
Prefer options that name a job, not a fact. To explain, to warn, to reassure, to make sure.
Treat well, actually, to be fair and I mean as flags, and note them as they pass.
Read faint praise followed by a number as criticism.
Read repetition plus hesitation plus a tag question as reservation, not refusal.
Distrust options containing strong emotion words. Campus register is temperate.
When a speaker denies a motive, remember that the previous turn implied it.
Clip 4: a lecturer criticising carefully
What is the speaker's attitude towards the study?
He calls it a good piece of work, states directly that he is not saying the finding is wrong, and then locates the problem in the people who cite it. Holding those two positions at once is exactly what a concession structure is for.He explicitly denies this. When a speaker says I am not saying X, X is the misreading they are trying to prevent, and it is usually one of the options.Nothing questions the conduct of the study. The sample is described as a practical necessity, not as a flaw in execution.The textbook is mentioned as evidence of the study's reach, not as a target. He asks students to read it critically, not to disregard it.
Why does the speaker say "I am not saying the finding is wrong"?
This is the classic concession move. He anticipates the conclusion a student would jump to, blocks it, and then states his actual position with what I am saying is. The two phrases are a matched pair, and the second one is always the real claim.Concession is not doubt. He follows it immediately with a firm claim, which is the opposite of hedging his own position.No competing research is mentioned. This option invents an external authority to explain a rhetorical move.He develops the criticism in the very next sentence rather than deferring it. What he defers to next week is the exercise, not the point.
Who does the speaker mainly criticise?
He says the second step is skipped, not by the original researchers, who are usually careful about it, but by everyone who cites them afterwards. The not X but Y construction hands you the target directly, and it is easy to lose because the exclusion comes first.The participants are described neutrally as a sample. Nothing is asked of them at all.He specifically exempts them. This is the option the not X part of the sentence is there to rule out, and it catches anyone who heard only the first half.The textbook is mentioned once, to show how widely the study circulates. No criticism attaches to it.
Show transcript
Let's finish with a caution about the study I've just described. It's a good piece of work, and it's quoted everywhere, including in your textbook. But I want you to notice its sample: eighty-two undergraduates, all at one university, all volunteers, and all paid. Now, I'm not saying the finding is wrong. Undergraduate samples are a practical necessity, and a great deal of solid psychology rests on them. What I am saying is that a result from that sample tells you about that sample first, and about people in general only if you can show that the two behave alike. And that second step is very often skipped, not by the original researchers, who are usually careful about it, but by everyone who cites them afterwards. So when you meet this study in your reading this week, look at how the citing author describes it. Next week we'll take a paper apart and do exactly that.
Training this without more test material
Function and attitude are the parts of listening that improve fastest outside test practice, because unscripted speech is full of them and test audio is comparatively restrained. Two drills are worth your time.
The first is the stop-and-label drill. Listen to any interview or panel discussion. Every time a speaker finishes a turn, pause and put one verb on what they just did. Conceded. Deflected. Corrected. Softened. Hedged. Warned. You will find you have a very small vocabulary for this at first and that it grows quickly, and that growth is the skill. The questions on the test are written in exactly this vocabulary, so being able to produce it yourself makes the correct option recognisable rather than merely plausible.
The second is the removal test, which works on transcripts and requires no audio at all. Take any transcript in this course. Pick a sentence at random and ask what the listener would wrongly believe if that sentence were deleted. Cancellations are free: without it, students believe an early booking might be wasted. I am not saying the finding is wrong: without it, students believe the lecturer rejects the study. That question, what breaks without this, is the same question the test is asking when it says why does the speaker say this.
A final word on calibration. Attitude and function items are a minority of Listening, so do not build your whole preparation around them. But they are the items most resistant to raw language improvement, which means they are often what separates a band 4.5 from a band 5.0 once vocabulary and speed have stopped being the limit. If your practice breakdown shows you losing fact questions, fix those first. If your fact questions are solid and you are still stuck, this is where the remaining points are.
Monthly & Premium
9 more sections in this lesson
You have read the opening. The rest covers the method in full, with worked examples and practice questions that explain why each wrong answer is wrong.
All 45 lessons: Reading, Listening, Writing and Speaking
Real exam audio and record-yourself speaking drills
They ask why a speaker said something rather than what they said. Typical wordings are why does the speaker mention, what does the speaker imply, and what is the speaker's attitude towards.
In the clause immediately before or after the detail the question names. Speakers explain themselves in the same breath, so adjacency is a more reliable guide than intuition.
Not reliably. Politeness conventions vary between varieties of English, so calm delivery can carry sharp criticism. Answer from the words instead: hedges, tags, concessions and specific numbers.
Because campus and lecture register is temperate. Options like outraged or delighted overstate what the clips actually contain, and readings such as has reservations or is being cautious match the audio far more often.
It is a concession that blocks a misreading. Whatever follows I am not saying is a conclusion the speaker wants to prevent, and their real position arrives right after it, usually introduced by what I am saying is.