What this page covers
Below you will find the four interview prompts the researcher asks on this topic, a transcribed band 4.0 (CEFR B2) student response for each, and a rubric-anchored breakdown of why the response sits at band 4 rather than band 3 or band 5. If you want to see the full ladder, the band 3 version and the band 5 version use the same prompts. Background reading on the task itself lives in our 2026 Interview-task guide, and the wider score map sits in band scores and CEFR levels.
The four interview prompts
In a Take-an-Interview set the researcher records four questions on one topic. Items 1 and 4 are short framing questions; items 2 and 3 carry most of the rubric weight. The two main prompts here (items 2 and 3) appear verbatim in the band 5 favourite-class sample, so the comparison is fair.
- "Tell me a bit about what you are studying right now."
- "What is your favourite class so far this year, and what makes it stand out?"
- "Has there been a moment in this class that changed how you think about something?"
- "Would you recommend this class to a friend, and why?"
Sample answers (transcript)
Question 1 (warm-up)
“Tell me a bit about what you are studying right now.”
Um, right now I'm studying business, and this semester I have four classes. I have economics, accounting, statistics, and also a class about marketing. Most of them are okay, but, you know, some are more interesting than others. I'm in my second year now.
- Direct enough for a warm-up, but the listing format ("economics, accounting, statistics") is flat and uses the same connector ("and") every time.
- Two filler tokens ("um", "you know") in a 28-second answer is on the edge of natural; the band 5 version would use fewer.
- Eight seconds of silence at the end of the 44-second window is wasted speech time, not a confident close.
Question 2 (main)
“What is your favourite class so far this year, and what makes it stand out?”
My favourite class is, um, behavioural economics. There are a few reasons. First, the professor is good. She uses examples from real life, like one example was about retirement plans and how a small change can make more people sign up. I think this is interesting because, you know, normally economics is just numbers and theory, but in this class we see how it works with real people. Also the class is small so we can ask questions and the professor remember our names. The readings are short but, um, they are not easy. We have to read them carefully. So yeah, this is the class I like the most this semester.
- The structure is there ("a few reasons", "First", "Also") but the second and third reasons are not signposted as cleanly as the band 5 version, which uses a clean "First, second, third" frame.
- One subject-verb agreement slip ("the professor remember our names") and one rough phrase ("the professor is good"). Band 5 would say "she draws a clear thread" or similar.
- The retirement-plan example is mentioned but not landed: at band 5 the speaker walks the listener through the mechanism and the outcome ("nearly tripled enrolment"). Here, the example is just gestured at.
- Filler is moderate ("um", "you know") and not heavy enough to drop into band 3, but it adds up across 41 seconds.
Question 3 (follow-up)
“Has there been a moment in this class that changed how you think about something?”
Yes, actually. A few weeks ago we read about a study with jam in a supermarket. When the shop offered many flavours, like twenty-something, people looked but they didn't buy. When the shop offered only six, more people bought. This was surprising for me because I always thought more choice is better. Now I think too many options can make you confused, and you just walk away. So I try to, um, give myself less choice when I have to decide something quickly. It's a small change but it helps me.
- The jam-study example is recalled with one number ("six") but loses the other ("twenty-something" instead of "twenty-four"). Band 5 lands both numbers cleanly.
- Personal application is present ("I try to give myself less choice") but stated once, not extended with a concrete decision.
- "This was surprising for me" is grammatically fine but slightly unidiomatic; a band 5 speaker would say "this surprised me" or "this caught me off guard".
- No advanced lexis. Band 5 deploys "paralyses" or "consumer policy"; here the vocabulary stays general ("confused", "walk away").
Question 4 (closing)
“Would you recommend this class to a friend, and why?”
Yes, I would recommend this class, especially if my friend likes economics or wants to understand how people make decisions. The class is not so heavy in math, which is good for me. But you have to read every week, so if my friend doesn't like reading, maybe it is not the right class. Overall, I think it's a useful class.
- The qualified recommendation ("if my friend likes... but if doesn't... maybe not") is the right move and is what pushes this above band 3.
- "Overall, I think it's a useful class" is a flat closing. Band 5 closes with a sharper line, often a return to a specific from earlier in the answer.
- Twelve seconds left in the window is a missed chance to anchor the recommendation with one more concrete detail.
Rubric breakdown
Scores below are aggregated across the three rubric criteria the TOEFL Speaking section uses (Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development), with sub-rows for the three substantive items in this set (Q2, Q3, Q4). For the full 0 to 6 to band conversion, see our scoring-system explainer.
| Criterion / item | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery (Q2) | 3/5 | Pace is steady and intelligible, but two filler clusters ("um", "you know") sit on top of one mid-clause pause before "the readings are short". Stress patterns are correct on most content words, although "behavioural" comes out with the stress on the wrong syllable. |
| Delivery (Q3) | 4/5 | Cleaner than Q2: only one filler ("um"), no false starts. Rhythm is natural through the jam-study recall. |
| Delivery (Q4) | 4/5 | Confident pacing through the qualified recommendation, but ends 12 seconds early, which the rater hears as content thinness rather than calm restraint. |
| Language Use (Q2) | 3/5 | Sentence range is fine (one relative clause, one contrast with "but"), but one agreement slip ("the professor remember") and the repeated "good"/"interesting" praise. No topic-specific lexis ("nudge", "default", "enrolment"). |
| Language Use (Q3) | 4/5 | No grammar errors. Vocabulary still general ("confused", "walk away") rather than precise ("paralysed", "abandoned the choice"). One weak phrasing ("This was surprising for me") flagged. |
| Language Use (Q4) | 4/5 | Conditional structure handled correctly ("if my friend doesn't like reading, maybe it is not the right class"). Closing word "useful" is generic. |
| Topic Development (Q2) | 3/5 | Two reasons given, one example named (retirement plans) but not unpacked. The band 5 version walks the listener from the policy change to the enrolment outcome; here the example is left as a label. |
| Topic Development (Q3) | 4/5 | Specific study cited, surprise registered, personal change applied. The shape is right; only the precision of the numbers and the depth of the personal application sit below band 5. |
| Topic Development (Q4) | 3/5 | Qualified recommendation is the correct move for a closing item, but the answer leaves time on the clock and never returns to a specific from earlier (the retirement-plan or jam example). |
What works at band 4
- You answer the question first, then add reasons. The opener "My favourite class is behavioural economics" is what separates this from a band 3 response that buries the answer inside hedging.
- You name a real example (the retirement-plan study, the jam study) on each substantive item. Even when the example is not fully unpacked, naming it is what raters use to lift Topic Development from band 3 to band 4.
- You handle a conditional structure cleanly in Q4 ("if my friend doesn't like reading, maybe it is not the right class"). At band 3 this would collapse into a flat yes-or-no.
- You use the full 44-second window on Q2 and most of it on Q3. You finish your sentences instead of being cut off mid-clause, which is a band 4 hallmark.
- Pronunciation does not block meaning anywhere in the set. Stress falls correctly on most content words, even when filler is present around them.
What to fix to push to band 5
Five concrete micro-revisions, each tied to a sentence already in the transcript. Apply these to your own practice transcripts and the same lift is available. For drilling delivery in isolation, work through the Listen-and-Repeat walkthrough first.
-
Land the example, do not just label it.
Before: "one example was about retirement plans and how a small change can make more people sign up."After: "yesterday she walked us through how a small change in the default option on retirement plans nearly tripled enrolment."
-
Fix the agreement slip.
Before: "the professor remember our names."After: "the professor remembers our names."
-
Tighten the surprise sentence.
Before: "This was surprising for me because I always thought more choice is better."After: "That ran counter to my intuition that more choice equals more freedom."
-
Replace flat closing words with a callback.
Before: "Overall, I think it's a useful class."After: "So yes, I would recommend it, especially the week we covered the jam study; that lecture alone changed how I make decisions."
-
Cut paired filler when one will do.
Before: "but in this class we see, you know, how it works with real people."After: "but in this class we see how it works with real people."
Compare with the band 3 and band 5 versions
Reading the three samples back-to-back is the fastest way to internalise what each band tier sounds like on the same prompt. The transcripts use the same favourite-class topic so only the proficiency varies.
If you want a different prompt at the top of the rubric, the band 5 "place that shaped you" sample applies the same structural moves to a personal-experience topic. For prompt practice, the 2026 Speaking topics list covers what to expect, and the Speaking tips guide explains the moves used in each sample.
Practise on a real Speaking test
Take a free TOEFL Speaking practice test with 11 tasks (7 Listen-and-Repeat plus 4 Interview) and rubric-anchored expert evaluation. If you want the full 4-section experience, run a complete mock exam instead.
Try a Speaking test